webclaw

Provider-source comparison

webclaw vs Apify

Apify is a hosted platform for running Actors, including general-purpose website crawling and site-specific data tools. Crawlee is its separate open-source crawling library.

webclaw

Hosted API + AGPL-3.0 open-source core

Standard page operations cost one credit per successful page. Search is metered per result, and Research has a separate allowance. The local open-source core does not include all managed services.

AGPL-3.0 coreLocal CLI / MCPHosted API
Apify

Actors and Crawlee

Crawlee: Apache-2.0; MCP: MIT; hosted platform separate. Crawlee and local Actors; hosted platform is separate.

Official MCP

Looking for a Apify alternative?

Apify supports LLM workflows through Website Content Crawler and an official MCP server. Compare the Actor’s input, output and pricing with Webclaw’s endpoint contracts; neither product requires you to build Markdown conversion from scratch.

Read the deep dive: Apify alternative for LLM workflows

Features

webclaw vs Apify feature comparison

Documented capabilities, with a source for each entry. This is a documentation review, not a comparative performance test. An undocumented capability is not treated as unavailable.

webclawApify

Page content

Markdown, text, HTML and page metadata

Source

Page content

Website Content Crawler returns Markdown, text and HTML

Source

Crawling and batches

Crawl and batch endpoints; managed async jobs differ from local tools

Source

Crawling and batches

Deep crawl, multiple start URLs and configurable concurrency

Source

Web search

Hosted search with optional page scraping

Source

Web search

Search is available through selected Actors

Source

Structured extraction

Schema-based LLM extraction; a model provider is needed for local use

Source

Structured extraction

JSON datasets and Actor-specific extraction; inspect the chosen schema

Source

Browser features

Managed API rendering, screenshots and ordered actions; not included in the local core

Source

Browser features

Browser rendering, scrolling and screenshot output in Website Content Crawler

Source

PDFs and documents

PDF text extraction in the engine

Source

PDFs and documents

Website Content Crawler downloads linked documents; parsing depends on Actor

Source

Agent and developer tools

Open-source CLI/MCP and TypeScript, Python and Go clients

Source

Agent and developer tools

Official MCP plus JavaScript/Python API clients and Actor tooling

Source

Sources and deployment scope

Reviewed 2026-09-15. Maintained by Webclaw. Open-source licenses apply to the named repository, not automatically to a vendor’s entire hosted service.

Pricing

Compare plans for your workload.

Selected public offers in USD, reviewed 2026-09-15. Monthly billing unless explicitly marked annual. These rows are not equivalent workloads or a complete plan catalog; credit definitions, add-ons and taxes differ.

Provider reference checked 2026-09-15. Check current Apify pricing and terms. Unverified capabilities are not treated as unavailable.

OfferwebclawApify
Free option500 credits/month, no card; plus open source (self-host)Free: $5/month platform usage
Entry paid offerStarter: $19/month · 5,000 creditsStarter: $19/month plus usage
Another paid offerGrowth: $49/month · 25,000 creditsScale: $199/month plus usage
Higher-volume offerPro: $99/month · 100,000 creditsBusiness: $999/month plus usage

webclaw credit model

Page operations use credits; Research has a separate allowance. A standard scrape or extract uses one credit. Check the pricing page for operation rates and plan limits.

Apify credit model

Actor pricing varies: pay per event or resource usage. Compute, storage, transfer and proxies may apply. Some per-event Actors include platform costs; others charge them separately.

Apify strengths

  • General-purpose crawling for RAG as well as site-specific Actors
  • Hosted scheduling, datasets and an official MCP integration

Apify considerations

  • Capabilities and output contracts differ between Actors
  • Cost depends on the Actor and its resource or event pricing

Verdict

Which one should you use?

Use webclaw when

You want the Webclaw API and dashboard with page-credit billing, or its AGPL-3.0 CLI, MCP and self-hosted core. Managed features and local capabilities differ; test the deployment you intend to use.

Use Apify when

An existing Actor, custom workflow, scheduling or dataset storage fits your application.

FAQ

webclaw vs Apify, answered

Book a call

Apify supports LLM workflows through Website Content Crawler and an official MCP server. Compare the Actor’s input, output and pricing with Webclaw’s endpoint contracts; neither product requires you to build Markdown conversion from scratch.

Get started

See how it stacks up.

Cancel anytime. Run the same job on webclaw and Apify and compare for yourself.

View on GitHub