webclaw

Provider-source comparison

webclaw vs Zyte

Zyte API is a hosted service for HTTP retrieval, browser automation and automatic structured extraction. Its Python client and Scrapy integrations are separate from the hosted backend.

webclaw

Hosted API + AGPL-3.0 open-source core

Standard page operations cost one credit per successful page. Search is metered per result, and Research has a separate allowance. The local open-source core does not include all managed services.

AGPL-3.0 coreLocal CLI / MCPHosted API
Zyte

Hosted extraction API

Scrapy: BSD-3-Clause; agent skills: Zyte EULA; hosted API separate. Client or Scrapy runs locally; Zyte API remains hosted.

No official MCP found in reviewed API docs

Looking for a Zyte alternative?

Zyte supports managed browser rendering and extraction; this is not an unknown feature set. Compare its target-dependent request tiers and extraction schemas with Webclaw’s supported operations.

Features

webclaw vs Zyte feature comparison

Documented capabilities, with a source for each entry. This is a documentation review, not a comparative performance test. An undocumented capability is not treated as unavailable.

webclawZyte

Page content

Markdown, text, HTML and page metadata

Source

Page content

Raw HTTP body or rendered browser HTML

Source

Crawling and batches

Crawl and batch endpoints; managed async jobs differ from local tools

Source

Crawling and batches

Use the Python client or Scrapy to orchestrate multiple URLs

Source

Web search

Hosted search with optional page scraping

Source

Web search

Search API accepts queries and returns structured organic results or HTML

Source

Structured extraction

Schema-based LLM extraction; a model provider is needed for local use

Source

Structured extraction

Standard schemas plus LLM custom attributes

Source

Browser features

Managed API rendering, screenshots and ordered actions; not included in the local core

Source

Browser features

Browser rendering, actions and screenshots

Source

PDFs and documents

PDF text extraction in the engine

Source

PDFs and documents

Raw document retrieval is not a claim of PDF text parsing

Source

Agent and developer tools

Open-source CLI/MCP and TypeScript, Python and Go clients

Source

Agent and developer tools

Official coding-agent skills, Python client/CLI and Scrapy integration

Source

Sources and deployment scope

Reviewed 2026-09-15. Maintained by Webclaw. Open-source licenses apply to the named repository, not automatically to a vendor’s entire hosted service.

Pricing

Compare plans for your workload.

Selected public offers in USD, reviewed 2026-09-15. Monthly billing unless explicitly marked annual. These rows are not equivalent workloads or a complete plan catalog; credit definitions, add-ons and taxes differ.

Provider reference checked 2026-09-15. Check current Zyte pricing and terms. Unverified capabilities are not treated as unavailable.

OfferwebclawZyte
Free option500 credits/month, no card; plus open source (self-host)$5 signup credit, valid for one month
Entry paid offerStarter: $19/month · 5,000 creditsStandard: pay as you go
Another paid offerGrowth: $49/month · 25,000 creditsOptional monthly spending commitments
Higher-volume offerPro: $99/month · 100,000 creditsEnterprise: contact vendor

webclaw credit model

Page operations use credits; Research has a separate allowance. A standard scrape or extract uses one credit. Check the pricing page for operation rates and plan limits.

Zyte credit model

Zyte charges for successful responses by target tier and requested features. HTTP, browser and extraction pricing differ. A spending limit is a cap, not a subscription price.

Zyte strengths

  • Managed browser actions and automatic data extraction
  • HTTP and browser paths with Python/Scrapy tooling

Zyte considerations

  • Target tiers and selected features affect pricing
  • Custom attributes extend supported extraction types; review the schema constraints

Verdict

Which one should you use?

Use webclaw when

You want the Webclaw API and dashboard with page-credit billing, or its AGPL-3.0 CLI, MCP and self-hosted core. Managed features and local capabilities differ; test the deployment you intend to use.

Use Zyte when

You need Zyte’s browser automation or automatic extraction within a Python or Scrapy workflow.

FAQ

webclaw vs Zyte, answered

Book a call

Zyte supports managed browser rendering and extraction; this is not an unknown feature set. Compare its target-dependent request tiers and extraction schemas with Webclaw’s supported operations.

Get started

See how it stacks up.

Cancel anytime. Run the same job on webclaw and Zyte and compare for yourself.

View on GitHub