webclaw

Provider-source comparison

webclaw vs Firecrawl

Firecrawl offers a hosted extraction service and an open-source server under AGPL-3.0. Its cloud product includes scraping, crawling, search and browser interaction.

webclaw

Hosted API + AGPL-3.0 open-source core

Standard page operations cost one credit per successful page. Search is metered per result, and Research has a separate allowance. The local open-source core does not include all managed services.

AGPL-3.0 coreLocal CLI / MCPHosted API
Firecrawl

Hosted extraction API

AGPL-3.0 server. Docker Compose; cloud feature differences.

Official MCP

Looking for a Firecrawl alternative?

Both products offer hosted extraction and open-source tools. Firecrawl supports self-hosting; its default stack has fewer capabilities than Firecrawl Cloud. Webclaw compatibility covers documented /v2 routes, not every Firecrawl option.

Read the deep dive: Migrating from Firecrawl to webclaw

Features

webclaw vs Firecrawl feature comparison

Documented capabilities, with a source for each entry. This is a documentation review, not a comparative performance test. An undocumented capability is not treated as unavailable.

webclawFirecrawl

Page content

Markdown, text, HTML and page metadata

Source

Page content

Markdown, HTML, text and other formats

Source

Crawling and batches

Crawl and batch endpoints; managed async jobs differ from local tools

Source

Crawling and batches

Crawl, map and batch scrape

Source

Web search

Hosted search with optional page scraping

Source

Web search

Search with optional page scraping

Source

Structured extraction

Schema-based LLM extraction; a model provider is needed for local use

Source

Structured extraction

JSON extraction; AI formats have additional charges

Source

Browser features

Managed API rendering, screenshots and ordered actions; not included in the local core

Source

Browser features

Cloud screenshots, rendering and actions; default self-host lacks screenshots/actions

Source

PDFs and documents

PDF text extraction in the engine

Source

PDFs and documents

PDF parsing and other document formats

Source

Agent and developer tools

Open-source CLI/MCP and TypeScript, Python and Go clients

Source

Agent and developer tools

Official CLI, MCP, Python and Node.js SDKs

Source

Sources and deployment scope

Reviewed 2026-09-15. Maintained by Webclaw. Open-source licenses apply to the named repository, not automatically to a vendor’s entire hosted service.

Pricing

Compare plans for your workload.

Selected public offers in USD, reviewed 2026-09-15. Monthly billing unless explicitly marked annual. These rows are not equivalent workloads or a complete plan catalog; credit definitions, add-ons and taxes differ.

Provider reference checked 2026-09-15. Check current Firecrawl pricing and terms. Unverified capabilities are not treated as unavailable.

OfferwebclawFirecrawl
Free option500 credits/month, no card; plus open source (self-host)1,000 credits/month; no card
Entry paid offerStarter: $19/month · 5,000 creditsHobby: $19/month · 5,000 credits
Another paid offerGrowth: $49/month · 25,000 creditsStandard: $99/month · 100,000 credits
Higher-volume offerPro: $99/month · 100,000 creditsGrowth: $399/month · 500,000 credits

webclaw credit model

Page operations use credits; Research has a separate allowance. A standard scrape or extract uses one credit. Check the pricing page for operation rates and plan limits.

Firecrawl credit model

Basic scrape/crawl/map: 1 credit/page. Search: 2 credits/10 results. Interact: 2 credits/browser minute. JSON, Question and Highlight add 4 credits/page. Monitor rates conflict within the pricing page, so no Monitor rate is quoted here.

Firecrawl strengths

  • Managed API plus an AGPL-3.0 server
  • Scrape, search, crawl and browser interaction in the hosted product

Firecrawl considerations

  • Default self-hosting does not include all cloud services
  • AI formats and browser sessions use different credit rates

Verdict

Which one should you use?

Use webclaw when

You want the Webclaw API and dashboard with page-credit billing, or its AGPL-3.0 CLI, MCP and self-hosted core. Managed features and local capabilities differ; test the deployment you intend to use.

Use Firecrawl when

You need Firecrawl’s supported endpoints, browser interaction or ecosystem, or want to operate its open-source server.

FAQ

webclaw vs Firecrawl, answered

Book a call

Both products offer hosted extraction and open-source tools. Firecrawl supports self-hosting; its default stack has fewer capabilities than Firecrawl Cloud. Webclaw compatibility covers documented /v2 routes, not every Firecrawl option.

Get started

See how it stacks up.

Cancel anytime. Run the same job on webclaw and Firecrawl and compare for yourself.

View on GitHub