webclaw

Provider-source comparison

webclaw vs Scrapfly

Scrapfly offers scraping, cloud browser, screenshot, extraction and crawler APIs. Its official MCP integration supports page retrieval, browser interactions and AI extraction.

webclaw

Hosted API + AGPL-3.0 open-source core

Standard page operations cost one credit per successful page. Search is metered per result, and Research has a separate allowance. The local open-source core does not include all managed services.

AGPL-3.0 coreLocal CLI / MCPHosted API
Scrapfly

Hosted extraction API

MCP package declares ISC; no standalone license file found. MCP connector can run locally; scraping remains hosted.

Official MCP

Looking for a Scrapfly alternative?

Scrapfly and Webclaw both expose managed extraction and agent tooling. Compare the selected Scrapfly products and credit charges with Webclaw’s page operations; MCP is available on both.

Features

webclaw vs Scrapfly feature comparison

Documented capabilities, with a source for each entry. This is a documentation review, not a comparative performance test. An undocumented capability is not treated as unavailable.

webclawScrapfly

Page content

Markdown, text, HTML and page metadata

Source

Page content

HTML, text and Markdown through page/MCP tools

Source

Crawling and batches

Crawl and batch endpoints; managed async jobs differ from local tools

Source

Crawling and batches

Crawler API and parallel scraping

Source

Web search

Hosted search with optional page scraping

Source

Web search

No general search endpoint established in reviewed API sources

Source

Structured extraction

Schema-based LLM extraction; a model provider is needed for local use

Source

Structured extraction

Predefined models and custom LLM extraction prompts

Source

Browser features

Managed API rendering, screenshots and ordered actions; not included in the local core

Source

Browser features

JavaScript rendering, browser scenarios and screenshots

Source

PDFs and documents

PDF text extraction in the engine

Source

PDFs and documents

No PDF parsing claim established by these sources

Source

Agent and developer tools

Open-source CLI/MCP and TypeScript, Python and Go clients

Source

Agent and developer tools

Official MCP with public source; API client integrations

Source

Sources and deployment scope

Reviewed 2026-09-15. Maintained by Webclaw. Open-source licenses apply to the named repository, not automatically to a vendor’s entire hosted service.

Pricing

Compare plans for your workload.

Selected public offers in USD, reviewed 2026-09-15. Monthly billing unless explicitly marked annual. These rows are not equivalent workloads or a complete plan catalog; credit definitions, add-ons and taxes differ.

Provider reference checked 2026-09-15. Check current Scrapfly pricing and terms. Unverified capabilities are not treated as unavailable.

OfferwebclawScrapfly
Free option500 credits/month, no card; plus open source (self-host)1,000 signup credits; no card
Entry paid offerStarter: $19/month · 5,000 creditsDiscovery: $30/month · 200,000 credits
Another paid offerGrowth: $49/month · 25,000 creditsPro: $100/month · 1,000,000 credits
Higher-volume offerPro: $99/month · 100,000 creditsStartup: $250/month · 2,500,000 credits

webclaw credit model

Page operations use credits; Research has a separate allowance. A standard scrape or extract uses one credit. Check the pricing page for operation rates and plan limits.

Scrapfly credit model

One balance covers multiple APIs. Rendering, residential access, screenshots and AI extraction affect credit use. Pricing and MCP FAQ show different examples, so no universal multiplier is quoted. Discovery caps at quota; higher plans support paid overflow.

Scrapfly strengths

  • Several managed APIs share one credit balance
  • MCP includes browser controls and AI extraction

Scrapfly considerations

  • Credit costs depend on the operation and options
  • Paid overflow behavior differs between plans

Verdict

Which one should you use?

Use webclaw when

You want the Webclaw API and dashboard with page-credit billing, or its AGPL-3.0 CLI, MCP and self-hosted core. Managed features and local capabilities differ; test the deployment you intend to use.

Use Scrapfly when

Its browser controls, extraction models or crawler workflow fit your application.

FAQ

webclaw vs Scrapfly, answered

Book a call

Scrapfly and Webclaw both expose managed extraction and agent tooling. Compare the selected Scrapfly products and credit charges with Webclaw’s page operations; MCP is available on both.

Get started

See how it stacks up.

Cancel anytime. Run the same job on webclaw and Scrapfly and compare for yourself.

View on GitHub