The honest comparison
webclaw vs Scrapfly
Scrapfly is a scraping API with anti-scraping protection bypass and data extraction. Here's how it compares to webclaw on LLM workflows and pricing.
Rust · AGPL-3.0 · self-hostable
One shared credit pool: a plain page is 1 credit, heavier work adds a few (JS render +2, protected site +9). Crawl, batch, search and MCP included.
Cloud API (proprietary)
Credit-based. Basic scrape = 1 credit. Anti-scraping protection bypass = up to 25 credits per request. JS rendering = 5 credits. LLM extraction = additional credits.
Looking for a Scrapfly alternative?
Looking for a Scrapfly alternative without stacked ASP multipliers? Scrapfly's anti-scraping protection bypass costs up to 25 credits per request, and JS rendering adds another 5x. webclaw runs one credit pool, a plain page is 1 credit and a protected site adds a small fixed +9, with the same TLS fingerprinting under the hood. Built-in crawling means you do not have to manage URL discovery yourself.
webclaw vs Scrapfly feature comparison
Every core capability side by side. The webclaw column is highlighted; cells show exactly what each tool ships.
| Feature | webclaw | Scrapfly |
|---|---|---|
| Scrape (HTML to markdown) | HTML/markdown/LLM format | |
| Crawl (BFS with depth control) | ||
| Batch (parallel multi-URL) | Concurrent via async | |
| Search (web search + scrape) | SERP scraping | |
| Extract (LLM structured data) | AI extraction (beta) | |
| Screenshot (full page) | ||
| Browser actions (click, type, scroll) | ||
| Anti-bot bypass (TLS level) | Yes (ASP, up to 25 credits) | |
| JS rendering | Yes (5 credits) | |
| PDF extraction | ||
| MCP server | ||
| CLI tool | ||
| Self-hostable | ||
| Open source (AGPL-3.0) | ||
| Credit multipliers | One pool. Page 1, +2 JS, +9 protected. | Yes. ASP up to 25x, JS 5x, LLM extra. |
Is webclaw cheaper than Scrapfly?
webclaw bills from one credit pool: a plain page is 1 credit, heavier work adds a few. Compare the plans head to head, then read each credit model below.
| Plan | webclaw | Scrapfly |
|---|---|---|
| Free option | 7-day free trial (card required), or self-host free | 1,000 credits, no card (not a trial) |
| Starter | $19/mo · 10,000 credits | $30/mo — 200,000 credits |
| Growth | $49/mo · 100,000 credits | $100/mo — 1,000,000 credits |
| Pro | $99/mo · 250,000 credits | $500/mo — 5,500,000 credits |
webclaw credit model
One shared credit pool: a plain page is 1 credit, with small fixed add-ons for JS render (+2) and protected sites (+9). No separate proxy or JSON buckets.
Scrapfly credit model
Credit-based. Basic scrape = 1 credit. Anti-scraping protection bypass = up to 25 credits per request. JS rendering = 5 credits. LLM extraction = additional credits.
Scrapfly strengths
- Strong ASP (Anti-Scraping Protection) bypass
- Good debugging dashboard and observability
- First-class SDKs for Python, TypeScript, Go, and Rust
- LLM-friendly markdown and structured output
- Solid uptime and reliability
Scrapfly limitations
- ASP multiplier can consume 25x credits per request
- No crawling (must manage URL discovery yourself)
- Not open source or self-hostable
- Pricing unpredictable without detailed monitoring
- No CLI tool
- Not self-hostable
Which one should you use?
Use webclaw when
You need one shared credit pool instead of stacked ASP multipliers, want crawling built-in, need MCP for AI agents, or prefer open source with self-hosting.
Use Scrapfly when
You need strong anti-scraping bypass for specific protected sites, or value their observability and debugging dashboard.
webclaw vs Scrapfly, answered
Is there a Scrapfly alternative for LLMs and AI agents?
Looking for a Scrapfly alternative without stacked ASP multipliers? Scrapfly's anti-scraping protection bypass costs up to 25 credits per request, and JS rendering adds another 5x. webclaw runs one credit pool, a plain page is 1 credit and a protected site adds a small fixed +9, with the same TLS fingerprinting under the hood. Built-in crawling means you do not have to manage URL discovery yourself.
What is the difference between webclaw and Scrapfly?
Scrapfly is a scraping API with anti-scraping protection bypass and data extraction. Here's how it compares to webclaw on LLM workflows and pricing.
Is webclaw cheaper than Scrapfly?
webclaw bills from one shared credit pool: a plain page is 1 credit, heavier work adds a few (JS render +2, protected site +9). Scrapfly uses: Credit-based. Basic scrape = 1 credit. Anti-scraping protection bypass = up to 25 credits per request. JS rendering = 5 credits. LLM extraction = additional credits.
When should I use Scrapfly instead of webclaw?
You need strong anti-scraping bypass for specific protected sites, or value their observability and debugging dashboard.
Compare webclaw with others
See how it stacks up.
Cancel anytime. Run the same job on webclaw and Scrapfly and compare for yourself.