More sessions per GPU
56×
Read the case studyBring your streaming model. We integrate it and run the inference, managing execution, session state, and scheduling.

56×
Read the case study98%
Read the case study0 late beats
Read the case studyFaster shared steps create room for more live sessions within their timing budgets.
Swipe to compare
| What matters | Conventional LLM serving | .Wave engine | Benefit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit of work | Batch steps from bounded requests | Batch compatible steps from live sessions | Share GPU cost across live streams |
| Timing | Response and token latency targets | Per-session timing requirements | Keep streams on time |
| Scaling | Requests or tokens per second at target latency | Concurrent sessions meeting timing targets | Grow capacity while protecting active streams |
Models that process incoming data incrementally, without waiting for the full input sequence.
Why request-serving stacks fail continuous inference, and how WPK keeps recurring work on the GPU to serve 56× more real-time sessions on the same H100.
Read the article
AI inference is moving beyond requests. New input arrives incrementally, model state persists, and each output is useful only while it is still current.
Read the articleTell us about your model, expected traffic, and timing requirements.
Talk to an engineer